Regulatory Filings

Reply Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
February 27, 2020
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

On February 27, 2020, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Reply Comments to the Consultation by the Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on its Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality." Read more about Reply Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"

Follow-up Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
June 29, 2020
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

On June 29, 2020, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Follow-up Comments to the Consultation by the Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRIA) on its Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Read more about Follow-up Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"

U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Second Notice of Inquiry

Author(s): 
Annemarie Bridy
Daphne Keller
Publication Date: 
February 23, 2017
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

These comments were prepared and submitted in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's November 8, 2016 Notice of Inquiry requesting additional public comment on the impact and effectiveness of the DMCA safe harbor provisions in Section 512 of Title 17 Read more about U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Second Notice of Inquiry

Net Neutrality and Zero-Rating: Oral Testimony at the CRTC’s Hearing on Differential Pricing Practices Related to Internet Data Plans, November 4, 2016

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
November 4, 2016
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

Thank you for inviting me to testify today. My name is Barbara van Schewick. I’m a Professor at Stanford Law School and the Director of the Center for Internet and Society there; I also have a courtesy appointment at Stanford’s Electrical Engineering Department. I have a PhD in computer science and a law degree. I’m here as an independent academic whose research for the past 16 years has focused on the relationship between Internet architecture, innovation and regulation. The FCC’s 2010 and 2015 Open Internet Rules relied heavily on my work. My work also informed TRAI’s 2016 Order on zero-rating and the European Union’s recently adopted guidelines implementing the European Union’s net neutrality law. Read more about Net Neutrality and Zero-Rating: Oral Testimony at the CRTC’s Hearing on Differential Pricing Practices Related to Internet Data Plans, November 4, 2016

Comments on BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules, BoR (16) 94

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
July 18, 2016
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing
I welcome the opportunity to comment on the BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules. I submit these comments as a professor of law and, by courtesy, electrical engineering at Stanford University whose research focuses on Internet architecture, innovation and regulation. My book “Internet Architecture and Innovation,” which was published by MIT Press in 2010, is considered the seminal work on the science, economics and politics of network neutrality.

Comments on TRAI’s Consultation Paper on Free Data

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
July 14, 2016
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing
I welcome the opportunity to comment on TRAI’s Consultation Paper on Free Data. I submit these comments as a professor of law and, by courtesy, electrical engineering at Stanford University whose research focuses on Internet architecture, innovation and regulation. My book “Internet Architecture and Innovation,” which was published by MIT Press in 2010, is considered the seminal work on the science, economics and politics of network neutrality.

Comments on TRAI’s Pre-Consultation Paper on Net Neutrality

Author(s): 
Barbara van Schewick
Publication Date: 
July 4, 2016
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing
I welcome the opportunity to comment on TRAI’s Pre-Consultation Paper on Net Neutrality. I submit these comments as a professor of law and, by courtesy, electrical engineering at Stanford University whose research focuses on Internet architecture, innovation and regulation. My book “Internet Architecture and Innovation,” which was published by MIT Press in 2010, is considered the seminal work on the science, economics and politics of network neutrality.

U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Notice of Inquiry

Author(s): 
Annemarie Bridy
Daphne Keller
Publication Date: 
March 30, 2016
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

These comments were prepared and submitted in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's December 31, 2015 Notice and Request for Public Comment on the impact and effectiveness of the DMCA safe harbor provisions in Section 512 of Title 17. Read more about U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Notice of Inquiry

Regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy

Author(s): 
Daphne Keller
Publication Date: 
December 28, 2015
Publication Type: 
Regulatory Filing

Submission to the European Commission.  

Includes Supplemental response to “Should action taken by hosting service providers remain effective over time ("take down and stay down" principle)?” Read more about Regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy

Pages