The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School is a leader in the study of the law and policy around the Internet and other emerging technologies.
Publications
Counter Comments to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services
Counter Comments submitted to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services Read more about Counter Comments to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services
Comments on the Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications (BIPT) Draft Communication regarding the request to impose mandatory contributions by internet platforms to telecom operators for the use of their networks in Belgium
Comments submitted to the consultation by the Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications (BIPT) on the BIPT Draft Communication regarding the request to impose mandatory contributions by internet plat Read more about Comments on the Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications (BIPT) Draft Communication regarding the request to impose mandatory contributions by internet platforms to telecom operators for the use of their networks in Belgium
Are online applications users of a telecommunications service provided by their customers’ ISPs? A legal analysis
White Paper submitted to the Anatel Consultation on the Regulation of Users’ Duties. See also the comments submitted to that consultation. Read more about Are online applications users of a telecommunications service provided by their customers’ ISPs? A legal analysis
Response to Anatel’s Consultation on Item 6 of Anatel’s Regulatory Agenda for the 2023-2024 Period on the Regulation of Users’ Duties
Comments submitted to the Public Consultation on Item 6 of Anatel's Regulatory Agenda for 2023-2024 on the Regulation of Users' Duties. See also the White Paper submitted to that consultation. Read more about Response to Anatel’s Consultation on Item 6 of Anatel’s Regulatory Agenda for the 2023-2024 Period on the Regulation of Users’ Duties
Response to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services
Comments submitted to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services. Read more about Response to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s Consultation on Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services
La Parole à Barbara van Schewick: La Neutralité du Net aux Etats-Unis
Contribution (in French) to ARCEP's 2023 State of the Internet Report (L’état d’internet en France). You can read the press release (French) and the full report (French, pdf, van Schewick contribution on p. 48) here. Read more about La Parole à Barbara van Schewick: La Neutralité du Net aux Etats-Unis
Open Floor to Barbara van Schewick: Net Neutrality in the United States
Contribution to ARCEP's 2023 State of the Internet Report. You can read the press release (English), full report (French, pdf, van Schewick contribution on p. 48), and the complete section on Guaranteeing Net Neutrality (English, pdf, van Schewick contribution on p. 4) here. Read more about Open Floor to Barbara van Schewick: Net Neutrality in the United States
Brief of Internet Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant
The district court held that New York’s Affordable Broadband Act, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 399-zzzzz (“ABA”), is preempted because Congress occupied the entire field of interstate communications, stripping the states of their preexisting police power. This is a sweeping claim. If affirmed, it would invalidate vital state laws regulating areas of traditional local concern—including consumer protection, public health, and public safety. Read more about Brief of Internet Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant
Pages
