A ZERO SUM GAME? WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ZERO-RATING
"Is Zero-rating Really That Bad? Read more about A ZERO SUM GAME? WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ZERO-RATING
CIS explores how changes in the architecture of computer networks affect the economic environment for innovation and competition on the Internet, and how the law should react to those changes. This work has lead us to analyze the issue of network neutrality, perhaps the Internet's most debated policy issue, which concerns Internet user's ability to access the content and software of their choice without interference from network providers.
"Is Zero-rating Really That Bad? Read more about A ZERO SUM GAME? WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ZERO-RATING
"On a recent panel, AEI’s Roslyn Layton and Stanford University Law School’s Barbara van Schewickdebated the impact of zero rating on competition among application and content providers. The debate was noteworthy for more than just the icy weather conditions that necessitated panelists unable to present in person to video stream themselves in. Read more about Ice cream illustrates why you don’t need to fear zero rating
"Professor Barbara van Schewick submitted a 51-page report to the Federal Communications Commission on Friday that accused the carrier’s program, named Binge On, of violating the FCC’s general conduct rule that bars Internet service providers from unreasonably interfering with customers’ Internet choices. Read more about Mobile Makes Binge On Throttling Easier to Disable
"Das heiß umkämpfte Binge-On-Angebot des US-Mobilfunkbetreibers T-Mobile verletze den Wettbewerb, behindere Innovation sowie freie Rede und sei deshalb „vermutlich illegal“, schreibt die Netzneutralitäts-Expertinund Stanford-Professorin Read more about Report: Binge On untergräbt Netzneutralität