Avada Kedavra -- The Harry Potter Lexicon Disappears

Reference guides and companion books about literary works have been a critically important part of literature since its inception, and the right to publish them stood largely unchallenged. We agreed to help defend the Harry Potter Lexicon because J.K. Rowling's claims threatened that right, and because we believe the fair use doctrine protects the Lexicon, and other publications like it. We tried the case in April in a Manhattan Court and waited through the summer for a decision.

Today we found out we lost. In a thoughtful and meticulous decision spanning 68 pages, the Court recognized that as a general matter authors do not have the right to stop publication of reference guides and companion books about literary works, and issued an important explanation of why reference guides are not derivative works. Needless to say, we're very happy the Court vindicated these important principles.

But the Lexicon did not fare so well. The Court held the Lexicon infringed Ms. Rowling's copyright, was not protected by fair use, and permanently enjoined the publication of it. (Read the full decision here.)

Needless to say we're disappointed, as is our client, RDR Books. Careful and thoughtful as the decision is, we think it's wrong. So stay tuned to see where we go from here. In the meantime, thank Roger Rapoport, the Publisher of RDR Books for having the courage to stand up for free speech and fair use. He fought a fight that not many would have the stomach to fight, and we are proud to fight with him.

While you're at it, thank Steve Vander Ark. It's not easy to stand up to your hero, or bear the unjustified scorn of your fellow fans.

Finally, remember that avada kedavra -- the killing curse -- is not always fatal. One wizard survived it. Three times. And it was he who cast the spell (and won't be named here) that ultimately suffered for it. Maybe someday the Lexicon will be known as The Book That Lived.


This is completely unfair. I am a huge Rowling fan and I still say that she is in the wrong here.

Are you comparing the infamous Boy-Who-Lived "Harry Potter" to a book that copied from JKR's works?? Don't get me wrong, I like the Lexicon, but that's too cocky.

It's absure she would sue over this. The internet and fandom was two big reasons that Harry Potter was as big as it was.

He should be allowed to copy straight from the books without adding original material! Why is she being so mean about this? Who cares if it's in violation of Fair Use?

I had a question. I am an attorney and I read the decision. I noticed under section D on page 66 that the judge stated the Lexicon in Its current form is not Fair Use. I also noted that the judge gave a list of parts of the book that be found troubling. Does this Order in fact prevent a revised Lexicon from being published?

Add new comment