By Jennifer Granick on August 9, 2011 at 1:14 pm
This past weekend we saw another volley of rounds fired in the ongoing digital privacy wars. As with previous battles, this one started with the publication of an academic study and culminated in a class action lawsuit filed in the federal court in San Francisco.
The academic study was authored by U.C. Berkeley researchers (including my personal friends Chris Hoofnagle and Ashkan Soltani). It updated their 2009 study showing that online ad tracking firms Clearspring and Quantcast were using Flash capabilities in browsers to re-issue cookies even after users deleted them. The 2009 study inspired a class action lawsuit that Clearspring and Quantcast eventually settled for $2.4 million in cash and a promise to stop using the Flash cookie respawn method.
The July 2011 paper showed that while many websites had stopped using Flash cookies, some were using HTML5 Local Storage and a relatively new technique called Etags to follow individuals’ conduct on line. Because of the way these information methods work, a user deleting her cookies would nevertheless remain tracked by web analytics services, including San Francisco-based KISSmetrics.
For more click here.
Curtis J Neeley Jr., MFA August 17, 2011 at 2:00 pmPermalink
Authors, publishers, and lawyers created the ritual the United States sanctioned and labeled "copy-right" without using the hyphen in order to allude to recognizing a natural right instead of a national "rite for copying" .
Textbook author, Noel Webster, teamed with a career lawyer/judge/representative, Benjamin Huntington, in 1789 and created "the 1790 copy-right act" that was then signed into law by George Washington. Benjamin Huntington Esq felt his legal scholarship was more important than fighting in the Revolutionary War.
I have sued and seek to have copy-right declared unconstitutional as well as requiring that the FCC begin regulating wire communications. See the docket online, BY WIRE, free as mirrored and linked to PACER.http://www.curtisneeley.com/5-09-cv-05151/Docket/index.htm
I am looking for amici in the above case… It is likely to be ignored.
Add new comment