Disappointing ruling

Last week, the District Court ruled on the parties' pending cross motions for summary judgment.  The Court denied Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, and granted the government's summary judgment motion on all claims.  This means the case is over at the trial court level.  Although Plaintiffs had collected and produced much evidence of the harms associated with the enactment of the URAA, the Court was unpersuaded that the factual issues should preclude summary judgment or enter its analysis of the parties' claims.  We expect to appeal the order to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.