The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School is a leader in the study of the law and policy around the Internet and other emerging technologies.
Comments provided to the European Commission in response to its proposal for a regulation on fighting child sexual abuse online, which is available here. Read more about Letter to European Commission re proposed regulation on child sex abuse
On November 28, 2019, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Comments to the Consultation by the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on its Draft Guidelines on the Implementation of the Open Internet Regulation. Read more about Comments on Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) Draft Guidelines on the Implementation of the Open Internet Regulation, BoR (19) 179
On February 13, 2020, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Comments to the Consultation by the Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on its Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholde Read more about Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"
On February 27, 2020, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Reply Comments to the Consultation by the Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on its Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality." Read more about Reply Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"
On June 29, 2020, Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering and Director of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, submitted Follow-up Comments to the Consultation by the Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRIA) on its Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Read more about Follow-up Comments on Telekom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Consultation Paper on "Traffic Management Practices (TMPs) and Multi-Stakeholder Body for Net Neutrality"
These comments were prepared and submitted in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's November 8, 2016 Notice of Inquiry requesting additional public comment on the impact and effectiveness of the DMCA safe harbor provisions in Section 512 of Title 17 Read more about U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Second Notice of Inquiry
Thank you for inviting me to testify today. My name is Barbara van Schewick. I’m a Professor at Stanford Law School and the Director of the Center for Internet and Society there; I also have a courtesy appointment at Stanford’s Electrical Engineering Department. I have a PhD in computer science and a law degree. I’m here as an independent academic whose research for the past 16 years has focused on the relationship between Internet architecture, innovation and regulation. The FCC’s 2010 and 2015 Open Internet Rules relied heavily on my work. My work also informed TRAI’s 2016 Order on zero-rating and the European Union’s recently adopted guidelines implementing the European Union’s net neutrality law. Read more about Net Neutrality and Zero-Rating: Oral Testimony at the CRTC’s Hearing on Differential Pricing Practices Related to Internet Data Plans, November 4, 2016
These comments were prepared and submitted in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's December 31, 2015 Notice and Request for Public Comment on the impact and effectiveness of the DMCA safe harbor provisions in Section 512 of Title 17. Read more about U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Notice of Inquiry
Submission to the European Commission.
Includes Supplemental response to “Should action taken by hosting service providers remain effective over time ("take down and stay down" principle)?” Read more about Regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy
The proposal for network neutrality rules is guided by the following principles: Read more about The Case for Meaningful Network Neutrality Rules
