How Much Privacy Should We Trade to Survive a Pandemic?

April 1, 2020 12:00 pm

A number of countries, including South Korea, Italy, and Israel, have begun using digital tools to track the movement of people who are infected, identify those who may have been exposed to the coronavirus, and measure the extent to which citizens are complying with stay-at-home orders. While the verdict is still out on whether these tools will ultimately prove effective at containing the spread of the virus during this first wave of the pandemic, the potential to automatically track the spread of the disease may be useful in the future. As researchers grapple with the practicality of these efforts, those in the policy arena must consider under what conditions, if any, government should be allowed access to such tools. Is greater location tracking necessary to protect public health in an era of global pandemics, or is it intrusive government surveillance? Can tools be developed that minimize privacy risks?

ITIF hosted a video webinar where panelists offered different perspectives about how policymakers should strike the right balance on privacy, both during and after a pandemic.

Speakers 
Daniel Castro
Vice President, ITIF, and Director, Center for Data Innovation
Moderator
 
Albert Gidari
Director of Privacy
Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School
Panelist
Rachel Levinson-Waldman
Senior Counsel, Liberty and National Security Program
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
Panelist
Peter Micek
General Counsel
Access Now
Panelist

https://itif.org/events/2020/04/01/how-much-privacy-should-we-trade-survive-pandemic

Focus Area: 
People: 

Add new comment