<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>reporter&amp;amp;#039;s shield</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/634/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Reporters&#039; Shield Law Overdue but Underpowered</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5570</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/commentary/circuitcourt/2007/10/circuitcourt_1009&quot;&gt;Proposed Reporters&#039; Shield Law Overdue but Underpowered&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This week&#039;s Circuit Court column is about the proposed federal reporters&#039; shield law that just came out of the Senate Judiciary Committee.  While we need a shield law, this one has a loophole for situations where the leak is criminal or tortious activity, and the loophole may just be too large for this version of a shield to do the trick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5570&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5570#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/240">Apple v. Does</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/reporters-shield">reporter&amp;#039;s shield</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:23:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5570 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
