<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>patents</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/607/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Survey of Eco / Green Intellectual Property</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5804</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;width: 195px&quot; class=&quot;image-attach-teaser&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/5804&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/images/eco-6.thumbnail.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Eco Patents in Suit by Class&quot; title=&quot;Eco Patents in Suit by Class&quot;  class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;195&quot; height=&quot;196&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With increased interest in global warming, green building and ecologically friendly behaviors, I initially observed that there was fairly little chatter concerning intellectual property aspects.  This prompted me to examine the extent that IP issues that consume us in other technologies, like the Internet or e-commerce are also affecting progress in the ‘green’ world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5804&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5804#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/eco">eco</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/green">green</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/patents">patents</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:07:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stuart Soffer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5804 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is there a 102(b) in your 401(k)?</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5468</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Let me clarify:  &#039;102(b)&#039; refer to a portion the US statute for patentability of inventions, and &#039;401(k)&#039; refers to the ubiquitous retirement account vehicles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forbes.com has a good article entitled &quot;Hedge funds and institutional investors are financing the latest wave of IP lawsuits.&quot;  See,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2007/0507/044.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2007/0507/044.html&quot;&gt;http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2007/0507/044.html&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5468&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5468#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/intellectual-property">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/investing">investing</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/patents">patents</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:56:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stuart Soffer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5468 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
