<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>spam</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/599/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Are Criminal Sanctions the Answer to Spam?</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5424</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In yesterday&#039;s Wired News Circuit Court column &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/politics/law/commentary/circuitcourt/2007/06/circuitcourt_0606&quot;&gt;Free the Spam King&lt;/a&gt;&quot; I take on the question of whether criminal prosecutions will stop spam, or are even fair.  This one has engendered a lot of hate mail.  It seems people really, really hate spam.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5424#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/377">cybercrime</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/spam">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:03:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5424 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
