<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>file-sharing</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/570/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Electra Entertainment v. McDowell: Is a thirteen year old still innocent (infringer)? </title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5610</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A federal district court in Georgia ordered a jury trial last week on the question whether a thirteen year old defendant was an innocent infringer or not. In Electra Entertainment Group Inc. V. Sarah  McDowell (2007 WL 3286622 (M.D.Ga.), a teenager defendant admitted to have used P2P networks for exchanging sound recordings, but objected the demand of plaintiffs (the record companies) to pay maximum statutory damages of $750 per infringement, in this case 48 times, which makes the fine figure of $36k.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5610&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5610#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/copyright-law">copyright law</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/file-sharing">file-sharing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:17:21 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zohar Efroni</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5610 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>9/27: RIAA v. The People: Four Years and Counting</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5542</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;width: 195px&quot; class=&quot;image-attach-teaser&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/5542&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/images/fred_highres.thumbnail.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;195&quot; height=&quot;129&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;event-nodeapi&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;content_event_for_speaker-start&quot;&gt;&lt;label&gt;Start: &lt;/label&gt;Sep 27 2007 - 12:45pm&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;content_event_for_speaker-end&quot;&gt;&lt;label&gt;End: &lt;/label&gt;Sep 27 2007 - 2:00pm&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-name&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Name of Speaker:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;Fred von Lohmann&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-bio&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Speaker&#039;s Bio:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred von Lohmann (SLS &#039;96) is Senior Intellectual Property Attorney for EFF. Before coming to EFF, he was a research fellow with the UC Berkeley Center for Law and Technology and an associate with the San Francisco law firm of Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-blurb&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Topic Description:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Four years ago, the recording industry inaugurated an unprecedented campaign of lawsuits against individuals who use peer-to-peer (P2P)file sharing networks to share music. Nearly 30,000 lawsuits later, has it worked? If not, what should be done instead? And what have we learned about the mechanics of federal civil litigation against&lt;br /&gt;
thousands of unrepresented individuals?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drawing on a recent EFF report summarizing the first four years of the recording industry litigation effort, Fred will discuss the recording industry&#039;s tactics and describe alternatives that may be on the digital music horizon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Free and Open to the public (no rsvp required).&lt;br /&gt;
Lunch will be served.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5542#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/file-sharing">file-sharing</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/p2p">p2p</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/riaa-copyright">riaa copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:14:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Amanda Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5542 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lessig joins RIAA board of directors</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5330</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some of the April Fool&#039;s news from the file-sharing universe. The scary thing is, that they are (or should be) all real alternatives, and each and every prank shows a solution to the current problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/04/01/lawrence-lessig-joins-riaa-board-of-directors/&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig joins RIAA board of directors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5330&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5330#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/april-fools">april fool&amp;#039;s</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/file-sharing">file-sharing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:01:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Balazs Bodo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5330 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
