<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>internet libel</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/561/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Illinois Court Rules Interactivity Irrelevant in Determining Jurisdiction</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5427</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BNA&#039;s Electronic Commerce &amp;amp; Law Report reports that an Illinois court has ruled that an interactive Web page offering out-of-state visitors the ability to set up an appointment and submit comments is merely an advertisement and will not support, consistently with due process, the assertion of general jurisdiction in forums where the Web site is viewed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5427&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5427#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:10:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5427 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German Court: Forum Owners Have Unlimited Liability for Comments Posted by Users</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5426</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Heise.de in Germany reports that a Hamburg court has ruled that forum owners should have unlimited liability, and are co-culpable for, any comments or discussions that take place on their sites, even if posted by third parties (eg. users) and without the forum owners knowledge. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/89368&quot;&gt;report says&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5426&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5426#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:31:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5426 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Libel Claim Over the Sun&#039;s &quot;Caprice in Clinic&quot; Story</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5423</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Supermodel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.caprice-online.com/&quot;&gt;Caprice&lt;/a&gt; has, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;amp;storycode=37871&amp;amp;c=1&quot;&gt;according to&lt;/a&gt; the Press Gazette, launched a £100,000 legal battle for libel damages over stories in The Sun and on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk&quot;&gt;the paper’s website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5423&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5423#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:42:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5423 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>User Discussions Land Google, Wikipedia and Openpolitics in Canadian Libel Suits</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5366</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070419.wwikipedia0420/BNStory/Technology/?page=rss&amp;amp;id=RTGAM.20070419.wwikipedia0420&quot;&gt;a report&lt;/a&gt; in Canadian newspaper, The Globe and Mail:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5366&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5366#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5366 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US Myspace Libel Case</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5344</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;C-Net &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6174506.html&quot;&gt;is reporting&lt;/a&gt; that a school principal in the US state of Pennsylvania has filed a libel suit against four ex-students who, he alleges, harmed his reputation by creating mock myspace profiles:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5344&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5344#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:15:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5344 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK Internet Libel and Privacy Case Settles Before Judgement</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Guardian &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,2044820,00.html&quot;&gt;reports that &lt;/a&gt; an internet libel and invasion of privacy case based on allegations over posts made on the blogs of advertising group WPP has been settled out of court. Proceedings had already begun before a jury in the High Court, which hears all UK libel cases. From the Guardian:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5309&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5309#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/375">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/defamation">defamation</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:48:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5309 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mostly Internet Libel (Links)</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5296</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;About two years ago, I started collecting links to posts, articles, academic discussions and case law about internet libel. I&#039;ve put this into del.icio.us where I&#039;ve used the tags &lt;a href=&quot;http://del.icio.us/Cybersoc/internetlaw&quot;&gt;internetlaw &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://del.icio.us/Cybersoc/internetlibel&quot;&gt;internetlibel&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5296&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5296#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/defamation">defamation</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/internet-libel">internet libel</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/libel">libel</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:15:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5296 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
