<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>dmca anti-circumvention fairuse</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/554/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>TracFone Gets Personal</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5271</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;: In a great article (which I&#039;m asking for permission to post in full) by Louis Trager for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warren-news.com/&quot;&gt;Communications Daily&lt;/a&gt;, Tracfone is claiming that I received personal favoritism from the Copyright Office. I.  Received FAVORITISM.  From the COPYRIGHT OFFICE! Stop laughing and keep reading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5271&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5271#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/cell-phone-unlocking">Cell Phone Unlocking</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/dmca-anti-circumvention-fairuse">dmca anti-circumvention fairuse</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:04:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5271 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
