<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>orphan works</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/521/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lessig on the orphan works bill</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5767</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Prof. Lessig has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/opinion/20lessig.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;OP-ED&lt;/a&gt; in the NYT today about the orphan works bill rolling now in Congress. Among the important points mentioned there, here are my three favorites: (1) to the extent that foreign authors are substantially deprived of copyright protection as a result of the new rule, the amendment will probably violate U.S. international obligations, and it would take the E.U. exactly two seconds to file a WTO complaint. (2) It makes no sense to put so much weight on the issue of “diligent effort” if rightholders are not required to register works, as in the case of patents, for instance. (3) It would be somewhat unfair to apply the rule retroactively to works by authors who relied on full, automatic copyright protection upon creation/fixation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5767&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5767#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/copyright-0">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/orphan-works">orphan works</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:53:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zohar Efroni</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5767 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Informal Formalities</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5208</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2007/02/audible_magic_c.html&quot;&gt;it seems&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/12/myspace-to-implement-copyrighted-video-filtering&quot; /&gt;MySpace&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/16765219.htm&quot;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt; are about to check fingerprints of media placed on their websites. This should become possible with the help of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiblemagic.com/index.asp&quot;&gt;Audible Magic&lt;/a&gt;, a company that specializes in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.in/articleView/index.jsp?artId=4096007&amp;amp;catId=2&quot;&gt;fingerprinting technology&lt;/a&gt; and maintains a database of digital works&#039; ID information, especially music and video.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5208&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5208#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/copyright-0">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/formalities">formalities</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/orphan-works">orphan works</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zohar Efroni</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5208 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
