<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>DMCA</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/428/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Elkin-Koren on Anticircumvention Law and Consumers-as-Participants</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5599</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://law.haifa.ac.il/faculty/faculty_index.asp?ftype=personal_page&amp;amp;lang=eng&amp;amp;lec_id=4&amp;amp;show=4&quot;&gt;Prof. Niva Elkin-Koren&lt;/a&gt; has uploaded a paper titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024566&quot;&gt;Making Room for Consumer Under the DMCA&lt;/a&gt;, to be published soon in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.btlj.boalt.org&quot;&gt;BTLJ&lt;/a&gt;. The paper provides a terrific analysis and introduces an original perspective, proposing to perceive users of copyrighted works as participating consumers in information markets. This perspective underlies the argument for granting consumers more solid and meaningful protections within copyrights law, &lt;em&gt;inter alia&lt;/em&gt;, a right to access cultural goods - despite DRMs. From the abstract:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5599&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5599#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/245">anti-circumvention</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/copyright-0">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/dmca">DMCA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:05:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zohar Efroni</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5599 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Digging the grave for next-generation DVD TPMs? </title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5392</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That a string of digits-and-letters receives the honor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HaNbsIfp0&quot;&gt;to be composed into a song&lt;/a&gt; is, I think, a noteworthy development. Sure, copyright law is about fostering creativity, but in this case it happened in a rather odd sense. People &lt;em&gt;sing&lt;/em&gt; the code to make it clear (even to the most shortsighted court) that there is a free speech issue here. Anyway,  the people at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digg.com&quot; /&gt;Digg.com&lt;/a&gt; say they will fight till the end. &quot;If we lose, then what the hell, at least we died trying,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/05/03/digg.copyright/index.html&quot;&gt;said Kevin Rose&lt;/a&gt;, the company founder. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/technology/03code.html&quot;&gt;NYT article&lt;/a&gt; from yesterday covering the story featured co-NR CIS Fellow Prof. Chris Sprigman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5392&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5392#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/copyright-0">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/dmca">DMCA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:59:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zohar Efroni</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5392 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>District Court Finds Failure to Demonstrate Circumvention of a Technological Measure in DMCA Claim Involving User Detection Feat</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/packets/200702/district-court-finds-failure-to-demonstrate-circumvention-of-a-technol-0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Plaintiff Auto Inspection Services, Inc. (“AIS”) sought a preliminary injunction against Defendants Flint Auto Auction, Inc., Inviso, Inc., and Priority Inspections, Inc. (collectively “FAA”) for copyright infringement and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DCMA”) with respect to an automotive inspection program.  In the copyright infringement action, the Court found that AIS failed to demonstrate substantial similarity of their program with FAA’s program.  In the DMCA claim, the Court found that AIS failed to demonstrate that FAA circumvented a technological measure that controls access to AIS’s source code.  The Court therefore dissolved a TRO against FAA and denied AIS’s motion for a preliminary injunction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/packets/200702/district-court-finds-failure-to-demonstrate-circumvention-of-a-technol-0&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/packets/200702/district-court-finds-failure-to-demonstrate-circumvention-of-a-technol-0#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/dmca">DMCA</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lauren Gelman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5204 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We All Now Wish We Were Film or Media Studies Professors</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5014</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, thanks to the Librarian of Congress, film professors and media studies professors can now make a compilation of film clips for class without breaking the law.  But ONLY film professors and media studies professors.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the Copyright Office’s website:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Librarian of Congress, on the recommendation of the Register of Copyrights, has announced the classes of works subject to the exemption from the prohibition against circumvention of technological measures that control access to copyrighted works. Persons making noninfringing uses of the following six classes of works will not be subject to the prohibition against circumventing access controls (17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1)) during the next three years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5014&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5014#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/378">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/dmca">DMCA</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth Townsend Gard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5014 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
