<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Student Fellow Project</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/414/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Some people have all the fun.</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5447</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Semiconductor Insights, a firm that reverse engineers products, took the screwdriver and pliers to an iPhone.  They have a video on YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.semiconductor.com/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.semiconductor.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.semiconductor.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPhciMud0MM&quot; title=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPhciMud0MM&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPhciMud0MM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5447#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/379">infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/projects/student-fellow-project">Student Fellow Project</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/iphone">iphone</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:49:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stuart Soffer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5447 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Update: Shloss v. Estate of James Joyce</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5045</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post is to update everyone on the progress of the litigation between Carol Shloss and the Estate of the late literary genius, James Joyce.  As this Website’s predecessor likely revealed, this case focuses on the extent the fsir use doctrine provides protections to academics to quote from both published and unpublished works in their scholarly endeavors, and how far a copyright owner can go in prohibiting that use to protect a families’ privacy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5045&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5045#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/374">Fair Use Project</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/projects/student-fellow-project">Student Fellow Project</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/shloss-v-estate-of-joyce">Shloss v. Estate of Joyce</category>
 <enclosure url="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/Amended+Complaint+Final%5B1%5D.doc" length="136192" type="application/msword" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sarah Craven</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5045 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
