<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Fuller v. Doe</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/389/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fuller v. Doe</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5403</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;H.G. Fuller v. Doe is an anonymous speech case involving an attempt by global adhesives company H.G. Fuller to discover the identity of an anonymous speaker on an online financial message board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5403&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5403#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/375">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/fuller-v-doe">Fuller v. Doe</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/anonymity">anonymity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 09:33:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5403 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doe Prevails: Motion to Unseal Seals Fuller&#039;s Fate</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5439</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cyberlaw Clinic client John Doe and his anonymous speech rights have prevailed in the fight against Global Adhesives company H.B. Fuller.  Fuller has withdrawn its subpoena to Yahoo seeking Doe&#039;s identity and has requested that the court dismiss Doe&#039;s appeal as moot.  This is a great victory for our client and for free speech rights online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5439&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5439#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/fuller-v-doe">Fuller v. Doe</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/anonymous-speech">anonymous speech</category>
 <enclosure url="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/18.06.07+Fuller+Req+for+Dism+of+App..pdf" length="248879" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:04:16 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Henry Lien</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5439 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doe Wins Motion to Unseal, Bodes Well for Preservation of Anonymity</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5416</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Sixth District Court of Appeal in California has granted Cyberlaw Clinic client John Doe&#039;s motion to unseal records in H.B. Fuller v. Doe. In the trial court, Doe and Fuller stipulated to sealing documents Fuller claimed contained confidential information.  On appeal, we moved to unseal the records in the appellate court because they do not contain confidential information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5416&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5416#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/375">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/fuller-v-doe">Fuller v. Doe</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/anonymity">anonymity</category>
 <enclosure url="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/H030099.PDF" length="69678" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:41:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5416 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appellate Briefing in Fuller v. Doe</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5404</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Some of the documents in Fuller v. Doe are sealed.  You can download the redacted versions of these documents, however.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5404&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5404#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/376">free speech</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/375">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/fuller-v-doe">Fuller v. Doe</category>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/freetags/anonymity">anonymity</category>
 <enclosure url="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/053609+Final+Order.pdf" length="218031" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 09:58:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5404 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
