Emily Somma v. GOSH [Peter Pan case]

The Cyberlaw Clinic represents Emily Somma, the author of new Peter Pan book that tells children growing up isn't so bad. In After the Rain, A New Adventure for Peter Pan, present day children rescue Peter Pan from Neverland so he can grow up. J.M. Barrie's original Peter Pan books are in the public domain now, copyright having expired. However subsequent Peter Pan plays and a musical based on the Peter Pan books are still copyrighted in the U.K. The owner of those copyrights has argued that Somma can't write a book about the Peter Pan character and its lawyer has sent her a cease and desist letter.

Daisy Books, Somma's publisher, has a FAQ list on the Peter Pan character.

Article re settlement

by Colette Vogele, posted on May 2, 2005 - 9:14am.

This article in Ms. Somma's local paper discusses the settlement.

Settlement reached

by Colette Vogele, posted on March 16, 2005 - 3:37pm.

We are pleased to report that the parties have reached an amicable resolution of this litigation. The parties have jointly issued a press release announcing the settlement (press release). The terms of the settlement are otherwise confidential.

Ms. Somma is the author of After the Rain: A New Adventure for Peter Pan, ISBN 0973063947 (Daisy Books, 2002). To purchase, please contact sales@daisybooks.com, or visit www.chapters.indigo.ca.

Copyright Misuse

by Colette Vogele, posted on November 19, 2004 - 5:24pm.

We filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint today to add a claim for copyright misuse by GOSH. The motion will be heard on March 18, 2005, before the Hon. Judge Jeffrey S. WHite, of the District Court in San Francisco. See Proposed Second Amended Complaint.

NPR on Peter Pan

by Colette Vogele, posted on November 16, 2004 - 5:50am.

NPR's All Things Considered recently broadcast a background story about JM Barrie and the Peter Pan stories. The broadcast is available for download here.

Do you have a Peter Pan story to share?

by Colette Vogele, posted on November 8, 2004 - 4:31pm.

Now and again, we're contacted by authors who have had difficulty getting approval for a story about Peter Pan that they would like publish. If you have tried to negotiate a license with the Defendant (Great Ormond Street Hospital) in the past and would like to share your story with us, please contact CIS. We'd like to hear from you.

New settlement conference judge

by Colette Vogele, posted on November 8, 2004 - 4:25pm.

District Judge White reassigned our settlement judge. The settlement conference will now be before Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman sometime before February 18, 2005.

Judge Zimmerman, like all settlement judges, will not be involved in other aspects of the case (like making discovery or dispositive motion rulings). The parties will appear in person before Judge Zimmerman and, if there's room for negotiation, he will work towards resolving the dispute before the case proceeds further on the litigation front.

More on Disney-Gosh

by Colette Vogele, posted on October 14, 2004 - 10:39am.

Here's another story published yesterday at CNN.com about the Peter and the Starcatchers dispute between Disney and GOSH.

Peter and the Starcatchers

by Colette Vogele, posted on October 12, 2004 - 10:41am.

The press is reporting a dispute between GOSH and Disney over the publishing of a Peter Pan "prequel" -- entitled Peter and the Starcatchers -- by Disney's subsidiary (Hyperion). The book was written by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson. The Telegraph (London) appears to have broken the story yesterday (Telegraph article), and today the NY Post reported on it too (NYPost article). The Telegraph story refers to Emily Somma's case

Media errors regarding status of US Copryight in Peter Pan

by Colette Vogele, posted on September 7, 2004 - 1:06pm.

A few weeks ago the Defendant initiated a "contest" to find an author to write a sequel to Peter Pan. In its press release, it claims the US copyright in Peter Pan does not run out until 2023. The press release also assumes that authors who wish to write sequels to Peter Pan must have the Defendant's blessing. Of course, nothing is further from the truth.

A few news outlets recently picked up the story and printed articles about the contest. We are surprised that some news media took the Defendant's statements as fact, without first verifying the copyright status. None of the medial contacted us about this litigation which directly challenges the Defendant's contentions regarding the copyright status.

Case Management Conference

by Colette Vogele, posted on August 3, 2004 - 2:36pm.

The Case Management Conference took place on Friday before Judge Jeffrey S. White.

Prior to the conference, the parties submitted a supplemental joint statement. Rather than address issues that are normally covered in a joint statement (briefing schedules, trial dates, scope of discovery and the like), the Defendant attempted (unsuccessfully) to deflect attention from its own wrongdoings by turning the spotlight to CIS, calling the case "a cause." Interestingly, Defendant's portion of the statement declares that "[e]very party and lawyer involved in this matter knows that no [reasonable apprehension of being sued by Defendant] exists." (p. 4) Of course, nothing could be further from the truth, and we see Defendant's effort to downplay its conduct as a sign of the strength of Ms. Somma's underlying claims.

Syndicate content