<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>DirecTVDefense.org</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/13/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clinic files Amicus With EFF</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/003647.shtml</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Stanford Law School Cyberlaw Clinic and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org&quot;&gt;Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;/a&gt; filed an amicus brief yesterday in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, asking judges to uphold a lower court ruling and protect smart card and encryption researchers. DirecTV’s recent litigation campaign threatens legitimate research by seeking much larger damages than they should be entitled to under Federal law. If DirecTV’s position is adopted, individuals could face up to $100,000 in damages for unauthorized smart card use; the Clinic worries that legitimate smart card researchers may be deterred from doing their work out of fear of such large liability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/003647.shtml&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/003647.shtml#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/13">DirecTVDefense.org</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2751 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DirecTVDefense Website Launched</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/001833.shtml</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.directvdefense.org&quot;&gt;DirecTVDefense.org&lt;/a&gt; for information about the legality of smart cards, DirecTV&#039;s tactics in fighting signal piracy, and our client the EFF&#039;s position on these tactics.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/001833.shtml#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/13">DirecTVDefense.org</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:59:25 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Granick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1079 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>None</title>
 <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/001404.shtml</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No updates for the moment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/001404.shtml#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/taxonomy/term/13">DirecTVDefense.org</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:47:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">645 at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
