Paris in the Ninth Circuit

by Zohar Efroni, posted on September 25, 2009 - 1:47pm

I simply could not resist sharing this one, for those who don’t check IPKat regularly. Apparently, transformativeness is not only a big deal in copyright fair use law, but also in tort claims for misappropriation of celebrities’ name and likeness (aka the right of publicity).

In the copyright context, at least, the underlying work – i.e., the work that is being sufficiently transformed (or not) by the defendant - must be original in the first place in order to give rise to a legal action. Would Paris Hilton’s pitch “That’s hot” qualify? Obviously not. But when Paris says “That’s hot” – then, folks, we have some heavyweight first amendment issues coming our way…

Comment by Eidechse (not verified), posted September 30, 2009 - 1:37am

Oh, Paris Hilton! One must hate or love her, but she is always very good for a laugh.

Comment by Carmen (not verified), posted November 9, 2009 - 7:59pm

Ah miss Hilton brings it all on herself doesn't she? Registering a trade mark for "That's hot" is a good illustration I think. IPKat has some good info, thanks for that.

Carmen- (Caribbean cruise deals)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.