Creative Commons just released Defining Noncommercial: A Study of How the Online Population Understands 'Noncommercial Use'. (pdf link). Here's a snip from the beginning of the empirical findings section:
The empirical findings suggest that creators and users approach the question of noncommercial use similarly and that overall, online U.S. creators and users are more alike than different in their understanding of noncommercial use. Both creators and users generally consider uses that earn users money or involve online advertising to be commercial, while uses by organizations, by individuals, or for charitable purposes are less commercial but not decidedly noncommercial. Similarly, uses by for-profit companies are typically considered more commercial. Perceptions of the many use cases studied suggest that with the exception of uses that earn users money or involve advertising – at least until specific case scenarios are presented that disrupt those generalized views of commerciality – there is more uncertainty than clarity around whether specific uses of online content are commercial or noncommercial.
Research was conducted by Netpop Research. The raw data has been published under the CC0 license.
Congrats to the CC team and Netpop on publication of this important resource for the on-line community.







Yes! i agree, there is so much uncertainty around regarding the term "commercial use" and there is a need to educate the masses regarding this.
Pretty good post. ckloo blogI just found your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your posts.
tiffany world In any case I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
ugg boots
congrats indeed, thanks for posting this thus bringing it to my attention.
I have seen this category recently and was somewhat confused by it. I think err on the side of conservatism is the best on this one.
I enjoyed reading your post and i look forward to reading more. thx.
Great article. I agree with you!
morbidmindz
Post new comment