Lennon v. Premise Media

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a controversial documentary about a contentious issue: whether proponents of intelligent design are being unfairly silenced in academia and beyond. It has been shown on more than 1000 theater screens nationwide, and its producers have drawn praise from some circles and scorching criticism from others. Right or wrong, good or bad, it's a film that explores important issues of free speech, faith and science. In exploring theses issues, the Film uses a fifteen-second clip from the John Lennon song "Imagine" and critiques what it suggests is the overtly anti-religous message embodied in the song, both explicitly and implicitly, by suggesting the absence of religion from society can have terrible social consequences. Yoko Ono Lennon has now sued the film's producers in federal court. EMI, the record label that asserts ownership in the recording of song has also sued the producers in state court. Both seek an immediate injunction forcing the removal of "Imagine" from the film. We have agreed to defend the producers of the film in both actions. The reason is simple. The right to quote from copyrighted works in order to criticize them and discuss the views they represent lies at the heart of the fair use doctrine. The lawsuits filed by Ono and EMI threaten important free speech rights that need to be defended. Watch this page for more information as the case develops.

New York Supreme Court Rejects EMI's Bid to Enjoin Expelled

by Anthony Falzone, posted on August 13, 2008 - 10:33am.

Two months ago, a Manhattan federal court rejected Yoko Ono Lennon's attempt to enjoin the further showing and distribution of Expelled: No Intelligence allowed on the ground that film used fifteen seconds of the John Lennon song Imagine.

EMI Records filed a nearly identical claim in state court based on the film's use of the sound recording, and demanded a nearly identical injunction. We're happy to report the state court has now denied EMI's request for an injunction.

The state court's order is particularly important because it establishes that fair use applies to the use of sound recordings under common law copyright, and rejects the insane conclusion of the Sixth Circuit in Bridgeport Music v. Dimension Films that there is no such thing as de minimis use when it comes to sound recordings.

Read the full order here.

Substantive Tags: Fair Use Project

Court Holds Producers Of Expelled Are Likely To Prevail On Fair Use Defense; Rejects Yoko Ono Lennon's Injunction Request

by Anthony Falzone, posted on June 2, 2008 - 1:43pm.

We're happy to report that the Court rejected Yoko Ono Lennon's request to enjoin the further showing and distribution of Expelled. In a twenty-three page memorandum opinion and order issued today, the Court held that the producers and distributors of Expelled are likely to prevail on their fair use defense and denied Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction in its entirety. Read the full opinion here.

Premise Media Files Oppositions to Preliminary Injunction Motions

by Anthony Falzone, posted on May 15, 2008 - 11:00pm.

Today we filed our oppositions to the preliminary injunction motions filed by Yoko Ono Lennon (federal case) and EMI Records (state case). They are attached below.

Substantive Tags: Fair Use Project

Fair Use Project to Represent Premise Media Against Yoko Ono Lennon and EMI Records

by Anthony Falzone, posted on May 14, 2008 - 12:49pm.

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a controversial film about a contentious issue: whether proponents of intelligent design are being unfairly silenced in academia and beyond. It has been shown on more than 1000 theater screens nationwide, and its producers have drawn praise from some circles and scorching criticism from others. Right or wrong, good or bad, it's a film that explores important issues of free speech, faith and science.

Yoko Ono Lennon has sued the film's producers in federal court because the film uses a fifteen second clip of the John Lennon song "Imagine." EMI, the record label that asserts ownership in the recording of song, has also sued the producers in state court. Both seek an immediate injunction forcing the removal of "Imagine" from the film.

Substantive Tags: Fair Use Project
Syndicate content