Error message

Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in Drupal\gmap\GmapDefaults->__construct() (line 107 of /mnt/w/cyberlaw/docs/prod/sites/all/modules/contrib/gmap/lib/Drupal/gmap/GmapDefaults.php).

Coming Through the Rye No More

Read more here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090701/ap_on_re_us/us_books_salinger
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/books/02salinger.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Consider this in the light of the very well known case of Suntrust v. Houghton-Mifflin (3d Cir. 2001), which has a similar case pattern. In it, the court allowed a retelling of Margaret Mitchell's "Gone with the Wind" from a slave's perspective. Deeming "The Wind Done Gone" a parody novel, the Third Circuit reinforced the Fair Use Doctrine. Here's a summary: http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=3121

Given this, how can the District Court's ruling feel right?

Add new comment