Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion to Quash on April 20, 2004.
Second year JuNelle Harris drafted a Reply Brief (Declaration) arguing that Plaintiff did not provided sufficient evidence or justification for the disclosure of the name of Cyberlaw Clinic's client.
Stanford Center for Internet and Society
In the heart of the Silicon Valley, legal doctrine is emerging that will determine the course of civil rights and technological innovation for decades to come. The Center for Internet and Society (CIS), housed at Stanford Law School and a part of the Law, Science and Technology Program, is at the apex of this evolving area of law.
Opposition and Reply Brief Filed
by Lauren Gelman, posted on April 29, 2004 - 10:22am.
About Lauren Gelman
Professional/Job Title
Executive Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society (CIS)
Our Issues
cybercrime
Fair Use Project
free speech
infrastructure
intellectual property
privacy
anti-circumvention books copyright copyright copyright law Creative Commons drm economics Fair Use FOIA Fourth Amendment Future of Ideas Google Hearsay Culture internet libel IP reform law school libel patent podcasting surveillance tcblog Testimony trademarks web 2.0
anti-circumvention books copyright copyright copyright law Creative Commons drm economics Fair Use FOIA Fourth Amendment Future of Ideas Google Hearsay Culture internet libel IP reform law school libel patent podcasting surveillance tcblog Testimony trademarks web 2.0